To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 4034
4033  |  4035
Subject: 
Re: Geek Speak?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:37:52 GMT
Viewed: 
21 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Dave Schuler writes:
I tend to be very aware of linguistic quirks, such the overuse of the word
"literally" (ie, it's literally raining cats and dogs out there) or the
whole implied/inferred conflation.  In my more uptight past I used to get
annoyed by some of these, but then I got my head out of my #ss and realized
it's not actually that big a deal except in formal communication, and often
not even then.


No comment on the origin of "me like," but here's a misuse that really
cheeses me off: overuse of the word 'impact,' especially as a verb.
It used to be a noun meaning a physical collision, but is often used when
the speaker should be using 'affect' or 'effect.'  The aggravating part is
not so much the misuse, but rather the people who use it - they almost
always seem to be trying really hard to sound like an expert on whatever
topic they're discussing.  I'd really like to impact those people right in
the head.

Other pretentious workplace words that are annoying:
Functionality - it has a FUNCTION, not FUNCTIONALITY!
Methodology - What's wrong with 'method?' Why use five syllalbes when two
will do?

Does anyone else out there has their own linguistic pet peeves?  I'm
literally all ears. ;)

groan.

Jeff J



Message has 4 Replies:
  Re: Geek Speak?
 
(...) As far as I'm aware, the first on-screen use of that "verb" was in Star Wars, when someone observed that proton torpedos "didn't go in, just impacted on the surface." (...) "Proactive" is a particular bugaboo re: workplace pretensions, but it (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
  Re: Geek Speak?
 
(...) I'm going to have to stick up for Methodology. A good methodology is way more than just method. (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
  Re: Geek Speak?
 
(...) You might not want to impact them too hard... I checked four different dictionaries (three printed, one online) and can find in each a reference to the word 'impact' being both a noun and a transitive verb. (1) Ex. Noun = a striking together; (...) (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
  Re: Geek Speak?
 
(...) Here's another pet peeve - writers who trust a spell-checker, but don't check their grammar. :) Jeff J (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

18 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR