To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 9965
9964  |  9966
Subject: 
Re: Geek Speak?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:30:42 GMT
Viewed: 
4636 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Jeff Jardine writes:

> No comment on the origin of "me like," but here's a misuse that really
> cheeses me off: overuse of the word 'impact,' especially as a verb.
> It used to be a noun meaning a physical collision, but is often used when
> the speaker should be using 'affect' or 'effect.'  The aggravating part is
> not so much the misuse, but rather the people who use it - they almost
> always seem to be trying really hard to sound like an expert on whatever
> topic they're discussing.  I'd really like to impact those people right in
> the head.

You might not want to impact them too hard...

I checked four different dictionaries (three printed, one online) and can
find in each a reference to the word 'impact' being both a noun and a
transitive verb. (1)

Ex.

Noun = a striking together; collision

Verb (t) = to press or drive firmly into something

Then of course there is the word 'impacted' which is an adverb.  Often used
in the dental sense, "he had an impacted widsom tooth."

> Other pretentious workplace words that are annoying:
> Functionality - it has a FUNCTION, not FUNCTIONALITY!

Whereas I would say it has many functionS.  Although working in a computer
development job I use the word functionality more often than not.  :)

> Methodology - What's wrong with 'method?' Why use five syllalbes when two
> will do?

To me, 'methodology' is just business-speak for a course of action or
strategy.  It is often overused by software architects and other folks who
think they know more than you.

> Does anyone else out there has their own linguistic pet peeves?  I'm
> literally all ears. ;)

I'm surrounded with business-speak all day; much of which causes me to shake
my head.  Apparently I loathe it so much that I've blocked it all, for I
can't think of a single example.  But I will... as soon as I post this, I'm
sure.  :)

All the best,
Allan B.

(1)  Unless I've misread your posting.  I can't quite tell if you know that
'impact' is a verb, but one that is misused. Or, if you aren't happy with it
ever being used as a verb.  If I've misunderstood, my apologies.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Geek Speak?
 
(...) Yes, 'impact' can be used as a verb, but not when the author/speaker should be using 'affect' or 'influence.' People seem to use it when they're trying to make a greater 'impact' on their audience, and that bothers me. I'm not alone on this: (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Geek Speak?
 
(...) No comment on the origin of "me like," but here's a misuse that really cheeses me off: overuse of the word 'impact,' especially as a verb. It used to be a noun meaning a physical collision, but is often used when the speaker should be using (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

18 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR