 | | Re: Trusted Users (was Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | (...) Likewise. I'd also be happy to pay a small fee to ensure that status-- I'd bet that those who seek to use the site to post idiocy and offensive things would be unwilling to put any amount of money where their mouths are. Nothing too crazy, (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Trusted Users (was Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question) —Scott E. Sanburn
|
| | | | | Lindsay & All, (...) I would not mind paying that as well. It would help Kevin and others out. (...) Well, I agree to some extent, I think it is bad when people upload things that have to be monitored. However, some of these monitoring issues are (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Trusted Users (was Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question) —Chris Maddison
|
| | | | (...) Agreed. The way I see it (if I may be so bold to suggest this) We all pay $10 (or whatever). Kevin gets money to help run the site and whatnot, and we get to be moderation-free and instant-uploady. Now, of course, if someone directs Kevin to (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Trusted Users (was Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) Sure, I'd even pay $10 to help Kevin out with the site and to have trusted user status. I'm very interested in seeing a solution to this. Brickshelf is a great (free) resource and I applaud Kevin for it. I understand totally his potential (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
