|
|
 | | New Windows OS???
|
| Headers indicate that this came from OpenBSD - and they would never lie. -- Forwarded message from Minister of Propaganda <do_not_reply@openbsd.org> -- Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 20:38:53 -0700 (MST) To: announce@openbsd.org From: Minister of Propaganda (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: lego turing machine
|
| (...) I got to thinking, maybe this isn't so impossible after all. Imagine if you used 2x2 blocks with 2x2 tiles on top. Now you have something the RCX can lift. Run two pieces of train track parallel to each other, with four spots' width separating (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: Brickset.com receives overhaul
|
| (...) You mean like one second before I send a request, instead of one second after I send a request? :-) Play well, Jacob -- (URL) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: lego turing machine
|
| Hi JDF, Thanks for the feedback. I know it's not a Turing machine in the true sense, but let me tell you what I'm trying to do. At the moment I realize that I have built a sort of binary adder. But what I am currently implementing is a change in (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: lego turing machine
|
| (...) An interesting idea, but the pedant and geek in me has to note that this isn't a Turing machine. Even ignoring Turing's original idea that the tape is infinite, the problem is that the Turing machine placed its output back on the tape. It (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
