Subject:
|
Re: Netscape 6
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sat, 17 Feb 2001 04:35:25 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@STOPSPAMMERSmattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
248 times
|
| |
|
|
Kevin Loch <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote:
> Actually Netscape 3 is an amazingly fast browser. Runs circles
> around later versions and Mozilla and IE. There relatively
Sure; same with lynx.
> few sites that are unusable because of javascript or other missing/
> incompatable features. The news reader was the best that Netscape
The newer HTML and XML stuff is really cool (not just "wow" cool but "well
done" cool). It'd be great if more sites _could_ use that.
> starting with 0.7, but it's still dog slow. The developers should be
> forced to use Pentium 166's with 32 megs of ram.
I actually use it on my P75/32mb Libretto. It's not too bad -- main problem
is that X has already sucked up all of the RAM. I'm going to have to look at
Nanozilla and Nano-X....
Startup time is also really bad, but once it's running, it's very snappy.
> While I'm ranting about Mozilla, I have to say I really *really* hate
> "moving things around on the screen after they are displayed". It looks
> really sloppy. I think it's supposed to actually be a feature but I
> consider it a huge bug.
You get used to it. There's not really any alternative, other than not
displaying stuff until the entire page loads.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Netscape 6
|
| (...) Actually Netscape 3 is an amazingly fast browser. Runs circles around later versions and Mozilla and IE. There relatively few sites that are unusable because of javascript or other missing/ incompatable features. The news reader was the best (...) (23 years ago, 16-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
