Subject:
|
Re: Screwed up newsreaders...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 15:55:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
93 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Frank Filz wrote:
>
> > Just noticed a way in which Netscape Communicator 4.75 is screwed up. It
> > determines threads solely by subject (unless I'm missing a configuration
> > option, I remember WinVN had several options for how to handle threading
> > which gave you a choice as to whether to base threading solely on the
> > references header or on subject).
> >
> > Ok, just did some tests. It's actually quite aggressive, it does ALSO
> > look at the references. So it can glom several threads which happen to
> > have intersecting subjects together. Yuck.
>
> Don't get too excited about this. Forte (Free) Agent does the same thing.
> I suspect it's a common custom on newsreaders.
>
> I think the longest-running thread on LUGNET has the subject "test". On
> lugnet.off-topic.test, of course.
I wasn't getting excited about it. I was bemoaning the fact that
Netscape doesn't give you the choice as to whether to use strict or
relaxed threads. It certainly can be more pleasant reading a thread
which is broken by a broken newsreader with relaxed threads, but I
dislike being forced to see threads which happen to have the same
subject as a single thread.
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Screwed up newsreaders...
|
| (...) Don't get too excited about this. Forte (Free) Agent does the same thing. I suspect it's a common custom on newsreaders. I think the longest-running thread on LUGNET has the subject "test". On lugnet.off-topic.test, of course. Steve (24 years ago, 16-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
