Subject:
|
Re: OT: P!$#ed of at ebay.com.au
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sat, 7 Oct 2000 03:34:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
145 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 03:28:28AM +0000, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Indeed. vi sucks... however I feel it's good to know since it is likely to be
> on every unix box you walk up to. My preferred editor (emacs) often has to be
> installed in order for me to use it.
while I used to use vi only in emergancies, I found that lately I use it (vim)
almost exclusivly. Not really sure why, cause I did install emacs on my
laptop... weird.
> I feel the same way about notepad on Windows boxes, it stinks but it's how I
> usually program if I am at a client site for only a day or two.
well, on windows you rarely actually need to edit text files...
--
Dan Boger / dan@peeron.com / www.peeron.com / ICQ: 1130750
<set:1504_1>: Special Bucket w/Bonus Family Figures (LEGO/BASIC/BASIC 3+), '93
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: OT: P!$#ed of at ebay.com.au
|
| (...) be (...) be (...) au contraire. It's partly a style issue and partly a matter of the type of work you do, but I totally disagree, at least for me. I was just at a client in Alabama (monday thru yesterday) teaching them how to use our product (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: OT: P!$#ed of at ebay.com.au
|
| (...) Indeed. vi sucks... however I feel it's good to know since it is likely to be on every unix box you walk up to. My preferred editor (emacs) often has to be installed in order for me to use it. I feel the same way about notepad on Windows (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
