 | | Re: Tactical nukes (was: Real Pics Of New Mecha) —Mark Sandlin
| | | | I can't speak for Tom in this matter, but I've heard that Spamnium is a pretty powerful explosive source. ^__^ ~M (24 years ago, 31-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tactical nukes (was: Real Pics Of New Mecha) —Jeremy H. Sproat
| | | | | (...) We at Sproat Labs tried working with Spamnium (including its dirivatives Spamtomium, Spamitillium, and the dreaded Twice-Baked Spamcake), but it emitted so many bogon particles that we quickly exhausted our reserves of Fruitcake shielding... (...) (24 years ago, 31-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Tactical nukes (was: Real Pics Of New Mecha) —Mladen Pejic
| | | | | LOL! Good ones, Mark and Jeremy! Hmmm... Here in my universe, Spamnium is too powerful for our reactors to bear... Just last week 12 colonies were whipped-out when one reactor went critical! Damn spam, wish we never even mined it! ;-) Mladen (...) (...) (24 years ago, 31-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | | |
