| | Re: X server for windows
|
| (...) :) Dan (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: X server for windows
|
| (...) Kinda funny. Not particularly _accurate_ though. (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: X server for windows
|
| (...) Since we're in .ot.geek, and since I see you've upped your rev to 0.9, when are you going to add References to your headers so your messages will thread properly? ;-) (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: X server for windows
|
| (...) I suspect it was when it was written. There is a reference to X11R4 being the latest rev near the end of the piece. (25 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: X server for windows
|
| (...) Even then, I've got some bones to pick. :) The bit about the client server terminology, for example -- sure, it's a bit confusing, but their explanation is worse. (25 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: X server for windows
|
| (...) doh! I had it working correctly, must have broken it someplace... that's what I get when I don't read through the web interface anymore.... I'll work on it right away! Dan (25 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: X server for windows
|
| (...) there... is this better? (25 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: X server for windows
|
| (...) si. danke schon. (25 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | LugnetReader
|
| (...) Yep, thanks! BTW, it was noticeable from some NNTP-readers, too. I don't read through the web interface either. Is there a LUGNET discussion of LugnetReader somewhere? Will it be just for reading Lugnet (with Lugnet-specific hooks thrown in) (...) (25 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: LugnetReader
|
| (...) nod, of course. Once again, sorry - A typo in the wrong place might not crash the program, just make it not work as you want it. :/ (...) There's no public release yet, though I just now (2 minutes ago) finished setting it up so it can poll (...) (25 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: LugnetReader
|
| (...) Oooh, good question. We really need some place to discuss it, esp. (right now) the spooler -> client API. (...) How releasable is your spooler? Good enough to let me work with it for my client? (...) I'll beta-test that for ya, Dan. :-, I'm (...) (25 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: LugnetReader
|
| (...) guess we have that now - FUT to lugnet.admin.nntp :) (heh, and first test to see if the fut works correctly :) (...) well, the spooler right now just sits there all the time, getting messages once a minute, and stores them on disk in a spool (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |