 | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Dan Boger
|
| | | (...) heheh. that's almost the exact situation we have here. 486/25 running RH6.0 (6.1 won't install, didn't have time to get it to yet), compared to PIII/500 running win95... I can't say the linux is faster, at least not in X :P At work, however, (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Curious -- why won't 6.1 install? (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) not sure yet (only tried it today, after burning a CD at work), and the first thing I get asked after the bootloader is "please insert your driver disk". It doesn't matter which mode I choose (graphical, text, or expert), it doesn't say what (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) I think that they have in fact removed a few things from the 6.1 installl disk (it's a pretty tight squeeze), but it shouldn't have been anything remotely mainstream. In my (humble, of course) opinion, the 6.1/6.2 installer is terribly broken. (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) yah, that fits my experience with their install - you say that the 6.2 isn't any better? I havn't tried it yet... (...) nod - I ran into that trying to upgrade 6.0 to 6.1 in place, and failing misrably... ended up going a full install. (yay (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) It seems slightly better, but still ain't whatcha might call "robust". (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
