 | | Re: Need info on "#include" tag in HTML
|
|
keyed "altavista" into browser url window... keyed "what about the html tag include" into search window about a million matches... number two was (URL) time <30 seconds, I love altavista :?) bishop Franklin W. Cain wrote in message ... (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: The Pleiades
|
|
(...) Build your own, join the ATM community! My 8" mirror is coming along nicely... Jasper (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: MSIE5 security hole
|
|
(...) Sure glad I choose my family members better - and i certainly choose which of them I hand my email address to. If they're clued enough that I want to talk to them, they can damn well go to Dejanews^H^H^H^H. About the browser thingies: (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Need info on "#include" tag in HTML
|
|
Help! I need info on the "#include" tag (supposedly used to incorporate a separately stored "fragment" of common or repeated HTML code into multiple files). What I (vaguely) remember is: <!-- #include "my_fragment.h" --> Thanks in advance. Franklin (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Anyone used AutoPlay Menu Studio ?
|
|
Well, I'm working on a little project for a local ISP and I need a good, professional-looking autorun menu-type thing. I'm no coder, so I can't just whip up my own (actually, I did whip up my own with the help of a friend on Friday in VB, but it's (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | bad microsoft, bad.
|
|
yay! (25 years ago, 6-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: web design (was Re: Scout secrets revealed)
|
|
(...) Good point. It all depends on how often the nav bar stuff is going to be used. I can imagine some sites/types of content where you're going to want to always have the navigation stuff handy. For others, it's in the way most of the time. One (...) (25 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: web design (was Re: Scout secrets revealed)
|
|
(...) up (...) Yes, but that's the difference between doing it with frames and doing it without. Put the navigation stuff in a frame across the top of the browser, and suddenly, when you scroll down the page you're reading, the navigation frame (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | web design (was Re: Scout secrets revealed)
|
|
(...) Not true, Eric. It's too bad so few web designers get confused by this. The navigation stuff only takes up space if it is currently scrolled into view. Any long message on LUGNET serves as a good example. Visit: (URL) is a set inventory). See (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Ed Boxer Goes to Enfiled - reformatted and updated
|
|
Steve: (...) There is nothing in the HTML specification that prevents this (AFAIR). It is just like the "BANNER" element - nobody cares to implement it. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
