 | | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) That's a keystroke, right? A process runs to generate these pages quite frequently. We want the user to see the most freshly generated page without the user having to take any action of their own. So we want to put tags into the page to tell (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) <Ctrl> reload works for me. (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) Wicked excellent. I'm going to try that. So the cookie rationale there is to avoid having cookies accidentally set twice, yes? In case one of the caching entities isn't smart enough to automatically not cache pages containing set-cookie (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) I read somewhere that not all proxy caches will observe this. Actually I think it said they only look at the actual headers, not HTTP-EQUIV. It doesn't hurt to cover all bases. See my other post for details. KL (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) Here's what I do to guarantee no caching: void printCGIheader(){ printf("Content-type: text/html\n"); printf("Expires: 0\n"); printf("Cache-control: no-cache\n"); printf("Pragma: no-cache\n"); printf("\n"); } void printCookieHeader(char (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) Some browsers (I don't remember which ones, sorry) don't respect this. It's best to combine this with the expires header, I think. :( (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
In the header of the page add: <META HTTP-EQUIV="PRAGMA" CONTENT="NO-CACHE"> This tag also keeps pages from being cached by proxy servers... (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
(...) IIRC, there is a pragma no-cache that you can add to the HTTP headers. --Todd (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
|
Is there a better (any other?) way to force a page not to be cached but instead fetched from the server every time, other than using the META EXPIRES tag at the top of the page. That's the only way I found and am interested to learn if there are (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: IE css help
|
|
(...) Turns out the answer is: it's a bug in IE 5.0. Seems to be fixed in 5.5. (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: where can I find VB40032.DLL?
|
|
Did you ever find the needed runtime file? It is posted at (URL) A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:Fxt5zz.GGp@lugnet.com... (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "EarthLink.Net" = spam ?...
|
|
(...) Also, you might take a look at spamcop - (from memory, www.spamcop.net?). it'll analyze the headers for you, and even send mail to the right addresses to complain... I've found it quite effective. :) Dan (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "EarthLink.Net" = spam ?...
|
|
(...) It's an old protocol, designed before people even thought about problems like this. (...) finger, probably, or the equivalent. One problem with this is that having sites give out information about the existence or nonexistence of given (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "EarthLink.Net" = spam ?...
|
|
You're right in that the "real" sender's identity (or at least, sending location) can be traced via the headers, etc., and I know how to change my options to see all the headers/trailers/etc. I can see now how they could fake a return address and (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "EarthLink.Net" = spam ?...
|
|
(...) Earthlink is a very popular isp -- second after AOL. (Or perhaps third after Juno; depends how you count.) So it's very likely that people pick Earthlink as a target for forged addresses. It's also common to see things purporting to come from (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | "EarthLink.Net" = spam ?...
|
|
Over the past several months, I have noticed that an increasing percentage of the spam I receive is from addresses in the "earthlink.net" domain. Has anyone else noticed this? When I forward said messages to EarthLink's postmaster, they invariably (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | IE css help
|
|
Argh. Can someone help me understand some weird Internet Explorer behavior with cascading style sheets? Check out (URL). The text there should appear approximately like this: Lorum ipsum dolor sit ament, con; venami quis nostrud laboris nisi ut (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World HTML help needed
|
|
(...) That'll work! Thanks a bunch, Dan. 'Preciate it! -Chris (24 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World HTML help needed
|
|
(...) Like this? (URL) (24 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Castle World HTML help needed
|
|
Hi all, I was wondering if someone could give me a little help. On the CW member pages, when I try to add to the list of creatures that member has submitted, I end up making the entire table do some rather strange things. My HTML coding isn't that (...) (24 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
