 | | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
(...) Millennium is just a new win9x with some additional bells and whistles and will not have any "revolutionary" new things. I doubt the difference between win98 and millennium will be more than the difference between win95 and win98. Of course (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Ben Vaughan writes: snip [...] (...) Ben (& everyone) thanks for the pointers. I'll do a little more research as I have a week or so before I can borrow an external SCSI burner for the backup job. I think I'm leaning towards 2k (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 5:09:22 -0600, Rui Martins wrote (in message <Pine.GSU.4.10.10007...0@is-sv>): (...) Rui, Actually, NT and 2000 have much better memory management that 95/98. 95 and 98 will most likely only perform better on lower end machines (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
(...) I'm aware that this is not a Linux newsgroup, but I just have to comment this, as I find it somewhat misleading. I'm setting followup-to lugnet.off-topic.geek, which is a more suitable newsgroup. I'm sure you could install Linux on a 128MB (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Wet rock raiders?
|
|
hate to nitpick...but a rockraider ship would implode when it went down that far....while and aquaraiders ship would explode because from some of the vehicles...and the fact they're mining what apears to be asteroids there is no atmosphere and since (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.aquazone, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | where can I find VB40032.DLL?
|
|
where can I find VB40032.DLL? I have spent about an hour looking for it - no luck. Microsoft claim it should be on my '98 CD - no luck. Any ideas? Scott A (24 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Bad Choices
|
|
(...) Heh, I hear that all the time... the dutch pronounciation of 'w' sounds like 'way' so www.lugnet.com is in dutch 'way-way-way-puhnt-l...puhnt-kom' Some dutchies forget that the english 'w' sounds like 'double-you' and automatically give an (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Bad Choices
|
|
(...) But could i be the only one to refer to HTML as "hatemail"? or .shtml as (pardon my language) sh*tmail? <whining.."but that's what they look like without vowels...> Regards, --Electro-- (24 years ago, 14-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Reply not threading (Was: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog")
|
|
(...) Looks like your reader isn't setting the "References:" header. Judging by your message, you're using software called "Internet Mail Service" v5.5? Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: slrnpull and LUGNET?
|
|
(...) It was more or less random to me. I found no pattern, so I gave up trying to report it. Fredrik (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Setting the From: header in slrn
|
|
(...) makes sense, message-ids are supposed to be unique, i just wanted to change what part of the random id was. :) also, i'm curious as to the path stamp every message gets .. it seems most people have just '!lugnet', but others have '!lugnet!id'. (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: slrnpull and LUGNET?
|
|
(...) Did it consistently fail or succeed for certain groups or was it more or less random to you? --Todd (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: slrnpull and LUGNET?
|
|
(...) I haven't used slrnpull, but I have experienced the same behaviour with Gnus Unplugged. It would normally function just great, but some times it simply hung when downloading the articles in certain groups. I found some incomplete NOV lines in (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Setting the From: header in slrn
|
|
(...) As long as your newsreader (or posting agent/client) either leaves it blank or sets it to a unique value, it's OK. But it's not something to mess with in the same way that other headers like the 'From:' line can be messed with. IOW, the (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Setting the From: header in slrn
|
|
(...) i must have missed this message when you first posted it. what's wrong with messing with the message-id header? slrn took care of it for me on it's own, but now i let your server do the work. :) it's your server, so i'll leave it alone if you (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | slrnpull and LUGNET?
|
|
Okay, another slrn question, this one about slrnpull. I'm trying to spool LUGNET messages so I can read them offline. However, I'm currently having problem getting slrnpull to actually download messages. (2) I can see (1) that it connects to (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
