 | | Re: LEGO Mentioned in Business Week
|
| (...) Yes, but is it: January 2, 2003 January 3, 2002 February 1, 2003 February 3, 2001 March 1, 2002 March 2, 2001 (ignoring the six dates from a century earlier) Not that I was asking for a clear answer. It was just my example of an ultimately (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LEGO Mentioned in Business Week
|
| (...) I'd go for 1st of feb '03. But then, my country is pretty strict in dd/mm/yy. Jasper (25 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LEGO Mentioned in Business Week
|
| (...) My country is very settled on mm/dd/yy. The issue is international interpretation, of course. Steve (25 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
