Subject:
|
Re: Meat Isn't Murder (well, not anymore)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Sat, 23 Mar 2002 05:40:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
524 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> > http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/space/03/22/fish.food/index.html
> This is pretty cool stuff, but a loooong way from vat-grown meat IMO. I was
> assuming that while organic tissue would have to supply code for the meat
> production vats, you wouldn't need to start with 'live' tissue as a seed.
But it's an interesting first step, at least. At some point they would
presumably engineer beefy bacteria or cloned cattle cells to grow into molds,
or somesuch, but in the meantime this seems like some good foundation work on
the off-the-animal growth problem. The cow-fetus-blood solution seems a trifle
problematic, too.
> I would count that as 'weak' vat-grown meat. I'd wait for 'strong' vat-grown
> meat instead.
Analog vs. Digital vat-meat, perhaps. It'll be neat to see where they go
with it.
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Meat Isn't Murder (well, not anymore)
|
| (...) This is pretty cool stuff, but a loooong way from vat-grown meat IMO. I was assuming that while organic tissue would have to supply code for the meat production vats, you wouldn't need to start with 'live' tissue as a seed. I would count that (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
