|
|
 | | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
| (...) My son is ten. The only problem he had was what the other poster mentioned: even though he went to the restroom just before the start of the movie, he had to go midway through (I sent him at the safest point when little would happen onscreen) (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) It was a good movie. A solid, though flawed, interpretation of a book that is among the greatest masterpieces of literature ever produced. As a movie, the Fellowship of the Ring lacked the subtleties of emotion and sensitivity that sets a (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: If you google the phrase "Spooky Bible Stories"...
|
| AAAAAGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!! Hop-Frog, don't lead us to stuff like this, please! Have mercy!!! Seriously though, is this guy for real? -Dave (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Lord of the Rings movie
|
| Note: the second time through I listened to the music more. It's good too. Darn it, it has been in my head all day. You can hear the entire album in QuickTime: (URL) movies cost 30% less in the Midwest... (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
| Here's something I don't understand. WHY would anyone take children under the age of 10 to see this film. First off, it's rated PG-13. Secondly, it's 3 hours long. Finally, the story isn't suitable for younger viewers anymore than the Matrix was. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
