To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 8654
    Lord of the Rings movie —Erik Olson
    No Spoilers here! I too wanted this to be the Film of the Decade, but after viewing it in the flickering dark, all I can say for sure is "Now we had better have it again." As soon as possible, like tomorrow night. There are numerous original (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
   
        Re: Lord of the Rings movie —Bruce Schlickbernd
     I'll have to come back and read this later in the day, despite the "no spoilers" (and what's to spoil, I know the story backwards and forwards). My son gets out of school at noon today, so I'm taking off early today and going to see the movie (if (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
    
         Re: Lord of the Rings movie —Erik Olson
     After seeing it the second time, I'm starting to glow. I better give it a third chance. The second time through, I notice some evidence of shortened scenes. SPOILER -- NOT A BAD SPOILER -- WATCH FOR THIS In particular, Galadriel's gifts (or rather (...) (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
    
         Re: Lord of the Rings movie —Richard Marchetti
     (...) My random thoughts on it below: I just saw this film tonight and I have no significant experience with the material before this, although I may have seen those cartoons from the 80s which did not make that much sense to me then. Offhand, I (...) (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
    
         Re: Lord of the Rings movie —Bruce Schlickbernd
      (...) Despite it being a "trilogy" Tolkien wrote it as one long book and this has always been the chief hurdle in turning it into a movie. But there was no audible sound of disappointment at the showing I saw (or audible snickers in the wrong (...) (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
     
          Re: Lord of the Rings movie —Erik Olson
      (...) I'm picking on that scene because I just read some of The Two Towers, where Gimli quickly become Galadriel's staunchest defender. And of course it's crucial to the theme of uniting the races despite their old grudges, which the films do try to (...) (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
    
         Re: Lord of the Rings movie —Erik Olson
     (...) All I meant was that the director, Peter Jackson, seemed to be paying a little tribute with his visuals to 'Star Wars' -- and from the audience noises on opening morning, I suspect there are visual in-jokes for former Peter Jackson fans in (...) (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
    
         Re: Lord of the Rings movie —Bruce Schlickbernd
     (...) Rookie! :-) Bruce (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
    
         Re: Lord of the Rings movie —Erik Olson
     (...) Ageist! ok, maybe it was the 3rd grader bragging a little. -Erik (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
   
        Re: Lord of the Rings movie —Erik Olson
   Note: the second time through I listened to the music more. It's good too. Darn it, it has been in my head all day. You can hear the entire album in QuickTime: (URL) movies cost 30% less in the Midwest... (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR