 | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts...
|
|
(...) Actually, in the interest of lack of imagination, I let the eye-biting monkey sit down at the keyboard, and...well, you know how he is... (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Vast LEGO Conspiracy
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys writes: <ravings> Just so you know, this subject line reminds me of the other well known conspiracy... the "vast RIGHT WING conspiracy" that Hillary Clinton referred to. We all know what that is... it is the (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts...
|
|
(...) If you throw the axe back, the dwarf might disappear into a cloud of greasy black smoke... Man, does *that* bring back memories!! JohnG, GMLTC fut off-topic.fun (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts...
|
|
(...) Um, could you provide a sentence diagram for the above? I got lost in a maze of twisty little negations, all different, and now there's a dwarf throwing an ax... (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: What Do You See Here?
|
|
(...) Yes, my wife (and kids) was in Dallas visiting her family last week. Needless to say, she wasn't too excited about flying home with 2 small kids on Saturday. Plan B was to rent a car and drive 1400 miles home. Luckily we had a friend who was (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts...
|
|
(...) Not at all... it belongs in the category of logical fallacy. (...) My apologies for missing your point. I guess I'm just one of those people who, when hearing the hoofbeats, thinks horses, not zebras. (...) Sometimes it's enough to make one (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: What Do You See Here?
|
|
(...) It has to be an upside down exclamation point as photographing angels is forbidden under the 'Dieties and Other Supernatural Beings Act of 1907'. :p -Dave (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts...
|
|
(...) catagory of reasoning processes? It's not an antonym of reasoning? In the way I used it, it's NOT a verb facetiously inviting folks to reason out the meaning of a possibly glowing Snape head in the Harry Potter line, when there is no evidence (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts...
|
|
(...) Aw, gee Matt! I thought we had settled the question about begging the question.... (URL) C. (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: What Do You See Here?
|
|
(...) It's an angel, of course! Maggie C. (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
