To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 735
734  |  736
Subject: 
Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:41:17 GMT
Viewed: 
609 times
  
Mark de Kock writes:
B-)
Follow-up set to .fun (I hope..never tried it before)

[11] or can we assume you will drink it?[12]
[12] just trying this footnotethingy [13]
[13] etc..

I couldn't help myself [14], I had to try this follow-upthing myself. Sorry
for the inconvinience[15]

Mark

[14] Actually I could, but I don't want to.[16]
[15] Hitchickers Guide to the Galaxy
[16] Confused yet?



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
 
(...) Actually, its: "We apologise for the inconvenience.", IIRC. "What do you mean you've never been to Alpha Centauri? For heaven's sake, mankind, it's only four light-years away you know. I'm sorry, but if you can't be bothered to take an (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
 
(...) we (...) for (...) Sigh..I should have taken it to .fun I am well aware of the various aspects of the Shroedinger theorum, I was merely attempting some humor. Mea Culpa, it won't happen again.(1) 1: if this sounds a bit snide, that's because (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR