To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 368
367  |  369
Subject: 
Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 17:45:34 GMT
Viewed: 
1178 times
  
Jasper Janssen writes:
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:13:58 GMT, "James Brown"
<galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote:

I don't know... I think it's pretty safe to say we don't need to wait until • we
open the box to determine the state of the fishies existence...just listen • for
the sound of a satisified cat. :)

The box is sound, light & air proof. In fact, the material used is
impervious to any Electromagnetic radiation. Otherwise, the first
particle/photon that it emitted and that would happen to collide with
either the observer, or cause something to collide with observer,
would constitute a measurement in the sense that the collapse of the
Schroedinger Wave eqaution would happen immediately.

Japser

Sigh..I should have taken it to .fun

I am well aware of the various aspects of the Shroedinger theorum, I was merely
attempting some humor.  Mea Culpa, it won't happen again.(1)

1: if this sounds a bit snide, that's because it is.  I haven't had my coffee
yet.



Message has 4 Replies:
  Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
 
(...) <stuff> (...) Ohwell. Why can't I try to keep a straight face? Jasper (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
 
(...) merely (...) So...if we put YOU in this box and a cup of coffee, there is no way we can tell wether you drank the coffee or not? [11] B-) Follow-up set to .fun (I hope..never tried it before) [11] or can we assume you will drink it?[12] [12] (...) (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
 
(...) I couldn't help myself [14], I had to try this follow-upthing myself. Sorry for the inconvinience[15] Mark [14] Actually I could, but I don't want to.[16] [15] Hitchickers Guide to the Galaxy [16] Confused yet? (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
 
(...) As far as I understand the bos thing, while the state of things inside the box is not determined, we may assume that universal constants will apply. So it can be taken as read that I will drink the coffee. ;) James caffeine buzz & Lego - a (...) (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
 
(...) The box is sound, light & air proof. In fact, the material used is impervious to any Electromagnetic radiation. Otherwise, the first particle/photon that it emitted and that would happen to collide with either the observer, or cause something (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR