To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 7266
7265  |  7267
Subject: 
Re: DAM FUNNY!!!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Thu, 31 May 2001 03:39:06 GMT
Viewed: 
1204 times
  
www.go.com turned it up almost immediately:  Here's the link:

http://www.getipm.com/personal/dam.htm

"Dam" funny!!


--
Cheers ...

Geoffrey Hyde


"Matt Brooks" <mbrooks@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:3B15299D.3F6A624D@sonic.net...
> Not sure where this came from, but my sister sent it to me this
> morning.... ENJOY!
> 
>    Dam Problem
> 
>    The following is a genuine hoot. This was an
>    actual letter sent to Ryan DeVries from The
>    Michigan Department of Environmental Quality,
>    State of Michigan.
> 
>    Wait till you read this guy's response - but read
>    the entire letter before you get to the response.
> 
>    ------------------------------------------
> 
>    Mr. Ryan De Vries
>    2088 Dagget
>    Pierson, MI 49339
> 
>    Dear Mr. De Vries:
>    SUBJECT: DEQ File No. 97-59-0023; T11N; R10W,
>    Sec. 20; Montcalm County
> 
>    It has come to the attention of the Department
>    of Environmental Quality that there has been
>    recent unauthorized activity on the above
>    referenced parcel of property. You have been
>    certified as the legal landowner and/or
>    contractor who did the following unauthorized
>    activity:
> 
>    Construction and maintenance of two wood debris
>    dams across the outlet stream of Spring Pond.
> 
>    A permit must be issued prior to the start of
>    this type of activity.
> 
>    A review of the Department's files shows that
>    no permits have been issued. Therefore, the
>    Department has determined that this activity is
>    in violation of Part 301, Inland Lakes and
>    Streams, of the Natural Resource and
>    Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the
>    Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101 to
>    324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws,
>    annotated.
> 
>    The Department has been informed that one or
>    both of the dams partially failed during a recent
>    rain event, causing debris and flooding at
>    downstream locations. We find that dams of this
>    nature are inherently hazardous and cannot be
>    permitted.
> 
>    The Department therefore orders you to cease and
>    desist all activities at this location, and to
>    restore the stream to a free-flow condition by
>    removing all wood and brush forming the dams from
>    the stream channel. All restoration work shall be
>    completed no later than January 31,1998. Please
>    notify this office when the restoration has been
>    completed so that a follow-up site inspection may
>    be scheduled by our staff.
> 
>    Failure to comply with this request or any
>    further unauthorized activity on the site may
>    result in this case being referred for elevated
>    enforcement action.
> 
>    We anticipate and would appreciate your full
>    cooperation in this matter.
> 
>    Please feel free to contact me at this office
>    if you have any questions.
> 
>    Sincerely,
>    David L. Price
>    District Representative Land and Water
>    Management Division
>    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> 
>    RESPONSE
> 
>    Dear Mr. Price:
>    Re: DEQ File No. 97-59-0023; T11N; R10W, Sec.
>    20;Montcalm County
> 
>    Your certified letter dated 12/17/97 has been
>    handed to me to respond to.
> 
>    First of all, Mr. Ryan De Vries is not the
>    legal landowner and/or contractor at 2088 Dagget,
>    Pierson, Michigan. I am the legal owner and a
>    couple of beavers are in the (State unauthorized)
>    process of constructing and maintaining two wood
>    "debris" dams across the outlet stream of my
>    Spring Pond.
> 
>    While I did not pay for, authorize, nor supervise
>    their dam project, I think they would be highly
>    offended that you call their skillful use of
>    natural building materials "debris."
> 
>    I would like to challenge your department to
>    attempt to emulate their dam project any time
>    and/or any place you choose. I believe I can
>    safely state there is no way you could ever match
>    their dam skills, their dam resourcefulness,
>    their dam ingenuity, their dam persistence, their
>    dam determination and/or their dam work ethic.
> 
>    As to your request, I do not think the beavers
>    are aware that they must first fill out a dam
>    permit prior to the start of this type of dam
>    activity. My first dam question to you is:
>    (1) Are you trying to discriminate against my
>    Spring Pond Beavers or
>    (2) do you require all beavers throughout this
>    State to conform to said dam request?
> 
>    If you are not discriminating against these
>    particular beavers, through the Freedom of
>    Information Act I request completed copies of all
>    those other applicable beaver dam permits that
>    have been issued. Perhaps we will see if there
>    really is a dam violation of Part 301, Inland
>    Lakes and Streams, of the Natural Resource and
>    Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the
>    Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101
>    to 324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws,
>    annotated.
> 
>    I have several concerns. My first concern is -
>    aren't the beavers entitled to legal
>    representation? The Spring Pond Beavers are
>    financially destitute and are unable to pay for
>    said representation so the State will have to
>    provide them with a dam lawyer.
> 
>    The Department's dam concern that either one or
>    both of the dams failed during a recent rain
>    event causing flooding is proof that this is a
>    natural occurrence, which the Department is
>    required to protect. In other words, we should
>    leave the Spring Pond Beavers alone rather
>    than harassing them and calling their dam names.
> 
>    If you want the stream "restored" to a dam
>    free-flow condition - please contact the beavers
>    - but if you are going to arrest them (they
>    obviously did not pay any attention to your dam
>    letter being unable to read English) - be sure
>    they are read the Miranda rights first.
> 
>    As for me, I am not going to cause more flooding
>    or dam debris jams by interfering with these dam
>    builders. If you want to hurt these dam beavers
>    - be aware I am sending a copy of your dam letter
>    and this response to PETA.
> 
>    If your dam department seriously finds all dams
>    of this nature inherently hazardous and truly
>    will not permit their existence in this State,
>    I seriously hope you are not selectively
>    enforcing this dam policy or once again both the
>    Spring Pond Beavers and I will scream prejudice!
> 
>    In my humble opinion, the Spring Pond Beavers
>    have a right to build their unauthorized dams as
>    long as the sky is blue, the grass is green and
>    water flows downstream. They have more dam right
>    than I do to live and enjoy Spring Pond.
> 
>    If the Department of Natural Resources and
>    Environmental Protection lives up to its name, it
>    should protect the natural resources (Beavers)
>    and the environment (Beavers' Dams).
> 
>    So, as far as the beavers and I are concerned,
>    this dam case can be referred for more elevated
>    enforcement action right now. Why wait until
>    1/31/98? The Spring Pond Beavers may be under the
>    dam ice then and there will be no way for you or
>    your dam staff to contact/harass them then.
> 
>    In conclusion, I would like to bring to your
>    attention a real environmental quality (health)
>    problem in the area. It is the bears. Bears are
>    actually defecating in our woods. I definitely
>    believe you should be persecuting the defecating
>    bears and leave the beavers alone. If you are
>    going to investigate the beaver dam, watch your
>    step! (The bears are not careful where they
>    dump!)
> 
>    Being unable to comply with your dam request,
>    and being unable to contact you on your dam
>    answering machine, I am sending this response to
>    your day office via another government
>    organization - the dam USPS. Maybe, someday, it
>    will get there.
> 
>    Sincerely,
>    Stephen L. Tvedten
> 
> -----------------
> Matt Brooks



Message is in Reply To:
  DAM FUNNY!!!
 
Not sure where this came from, but my sister sent it to me this morning.... ENJOY! Dam Problem The following is a genuine hoot. This was an actual letter sent to Ryan DeVries from The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, State of Michigan. (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

3 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR