To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 7097
7096  |  7098
Subject: 
Re: 'Who wants to be a millionaire' last night
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Sat, 21 Apr 2001 03:32:14 GMT
Viewed: 
201 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Shiri Dori writes:
In lugnet.mediawatch, Larry Pieniazek writes:
This must be a UKism, as we don't use that phrase much. Beanie Babies are
"stuffed animals" I think. Of course, stuffed doesn't carry quite the
negative connotation in the US.

Actually I wouldn't agree. You're confusing two different types of "toys".
Stuffed animals are stuffed with different materials than most Beanies
(which, by definition, are usually filled with beans). "Beanie babies" is
quite a common name for these in the U.S., at least around here (Newton,
MA). My sister and her friends have quite a few "beanie babies", and I was
just at a toy store the other day that carried them under that name.

I think Larry meant "stuffed animal" as opposed to "plush toy."  :)  That is
how I read it, at least...

Jeff
"Plushie!"



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 'Who wants to be a millionaire' last night
 
(...) Actually I wouldn't agree. You're confusing two different types of "toys". Stuffed animals are stuffed with different materials than most Beanies (which, by definition, are usually filled with beans). "Beanie babies" is quite a common name for (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-01, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

6 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR