 | | Re: new stuff for 2001 —Scott Sanburn
| | | | To All, Well, I have no clue where this post is going, so anyway, fun is good enough for now. (...) Who knows / cares / anymore. Sheesh. (...) I just threw that out because I saw it was in trains. If it is really in development, cool. If not, oh (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001 —Frank Filz
| | | | | | (...) That was my point, there's no sense in getting excited about new sets around April 1 anymore (hmm, this is actually a case where it would be more exciting for a TLC employee to make an official announcement instead of a fan, you could believe (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001 —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) Dave *Low* posted the fact that the pic was up on BrickSet(tm). :-) So it would be *Low* to spoof us that way, if it was a spoof. :-) (...) You've seen James's work. I have been after him to commercialise the Cascade Talgo, I think it'd make a (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001 —Scott Sanburn
| | | | | Larry & All, (...) Indeed. (...) Ah, evil Larry, exploiting poor AFOL's for commercial gain! ; ) Heh heh heh heh (insert maniacial laugh here) I need to get some train creations going, to see what I can come up with. Once I get settled into Indiana. (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | |
