 | | Re: NDAs
|
|
Snipped for comedic effect. This is the last post, I gotta get back to work. (...) (1) (...) Except they get to build with their bricks at work without having to explain. 1 - Surely J2 meant "as JUST a company" as I never really thought of TLC as (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: The effects of Bulk Sales are evident....
|
|
(...) Right. There are so many OTHER things to mock him for! All other themes provide scenery for Trains. ++Lar (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: This is not a meeting with Lego Direct.
|
|
(...) I don't think we'd ever find out either way. As long as those cronies at Lego Direct insist on hiding the evidence. Lar, are you sure there weren't any minifigs crouching behind any grassy knolls at the summit? What about the 1x1 tiles? did (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: This is not a meeting with Lego Direct.
|
|
(...) Wait, Jar Jar's a minifig? Never mind what I said, then. (...) Why am I getting this sense of Deja(r) vu about this topic? ++Lar (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: This is not a meeting with Lego Direct.
|
|
(...) Aw, come on... not even a Timmy or a Jar Jar? Rule 5: No one is to hurt any Timmys or JarJars in any way. ... if there's anyone watching. Rule 6: There is NOOO...OOO Rule 6. ;^) ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Granite Grinder
|
|
(...) I bought a few of them when they were on sale at eToys a while back. This is what I did with mine: (URL) "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: This is not a meeting with Lego Direct.
|
|
(...) I can neither confirm nor deny that there was any wallpaper present. However I CAN say no wallflowers were present, we all particiapted enthusiastically. No minifigs were harmed in the creation of this post. At least that's the story we're (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: This is not a meeting with Lego Direct.
|
|
So is that like saying; you were at the Train summit, but you can't say what went on, because your role was inspector of venue wallpaper? To which extent you might have be able to tell us about the wallpaper if it weren't for the NDA, but as for (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: This is not a meeting with Lego Direct.
|
|
(...) Ya but saying he wasn't hungry gives plausible deniability later if it leaks out that food was actually eaten. ++Lar (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: This is not a meeting with Lego Direct.
|
|
(...) Yes there is some validity to it and I feel your pain. (hopefully it's not as bad as mine when I first learned that there was a secret pipeline for parts somewhere Down Under) I think the point you make is more valid for the CAD summit than (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
