 | | What's on and off topic( was Re: New ships for Astro Lift
|
|
(...) True, but irrelevant. Study the charters of the various groups to learn what the groups are for. Once you veer off topic for a particular group, you should consider redirecting. For example, although I am a member of MICHLUG, it is (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: What's on and off topic( was Re: New ships for Astro Lift
|
|
<I realize this is in off-topic.fun, so may not be a serious snipe, but I'll (...) <snip> (...) Whoops. I'm guilty of propogating a lack of proper "follow-up to" headers. Mea Culpa. I'll endeavour to be more ideally compartmentalized in the future. (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: What's on and off topic( was Re: New ships for Astro Lift
|
|
(...) I would agree... if I thought my remark snide. You must have since you put two paragraphs into it! :-) Yes. I should have jumped on it at the time but it did seem like it was going to veer back on track and then it got so massive that moving (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: What's on and off topic( was Re: New ships for Astro Lift
|
|
(...) Ye, but only a little bit. I found it much more snide last night when I was tired and grouchy than I found it this morning. This morning I mostly wanted to say "insufficient adherance to compartamentalization". :) (hey, this is o-t.fun, neh?) (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: What's on and off topic( was Re: New ships for Astro Lift
|
|
(...) WHOA, folks! I just sent Lar a not offline today, but I hadn't even read this far in the posts until five minutes ago. This was just a case of misunderstanding. I actually didn't pay attention to the newsgroups - I take responsibility for that (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
