To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 6530
6529  |  6531
Subject: 
Re: What's on and off topic( was Re: New ships for Astro Lift
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:17:28 GMT
Viewed: 
202 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, James Brown writes:
<I realize this is in off-topic.fun, so may not be a serious snipe, but I'll
respond anyway>
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Larry Pieniazek writes:
True, but irrelevant. Study the charters of the various groups to learn what
the groups are for.

Once you veer off topic for a particular group, you should consider redirecting. • <snip>
For example, although the SuperTrain show is vaguely train related, it is
inappropriate to carry out a long conversation about 93 iterations of a
layout design in .trains... that belongs in the ca.nalug group.

Whoops.  I'm guilty of propogating a lack of proper "follow-up to" headers.
Mea Culpa.  I'll endeavour to be more ideally compartmentalized in the future.

Keeping things on topic keeps things organized around here and helps us all
find information in the future without having to search all of LUGNET for
it. and that benefits all of us.

If you don't see the necessity of staying compartmentalised, at least
consider changing the subject line...

If insufficient adherance to compartamentalization irritates you enough to
toss in a snide comment about it a month later, shouldn't you say somthing
about it at the time?

I agree, compartamentalization is good, but don't you think a "hey, this
doesn't really belong in .trains" comment at the time is more effective than
a snide remark a month later?

I would agree... if I thought my remark snide. You must have since you put
two paragraphs into it! :-)

Yes.

I should have jumped on it at the time but it did seem like it was going to
veer back on track and then it got so massive that moving it would have been
like turning a tanker.

So it just makes a great counterexample now, when its too late to actually fix.

++Lar



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: What's on and off topic( was Re: New ships for Astro Lift
 
(...) Ye, but only a little bit. I found it much more snide last night when I was tired and grouchy than I found it this morning. This morning I mostly wanted to say "insufficient adherance to compartamentalization". :) (hey, this is o-t.fun, neh?) (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: What's on and off topic( was Re: New ships for Astro Lift
 
(...) WHOA, folks! I just sent Lar a not offline today, but I hadn't even read this far in the posts until five minutes ago. This was just a case of misunderstanding. I actually didn't pay attention to the newsgroups - I take responsibility for that (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: What's on and off topic( was Re: New ships for Astro Lift
 
<I realize this is in off-topic.fun, so may not be a serious snipe, but I'll (...) <snip> (...) Whoops. I'm guilty of propogating a lack of proper "follow-up to" headers. Mea Culpa. I'll endeavour to be more ideally compartmentalized in the future. (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

6 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR