 | | Re: Screen Resolution Poll —Tim Courtney
|
| | | "Nick Crocco" <swatlego@aol.com> wrote in message news:FzKuMs.FHv@lugnet.com... (...) I use 1280x1024, but keep my browser pretty narrow - not usually more than 700. I wouldn't worry *too* much about 640x480 folks, the majority use 800x600 and up. (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Screen Resolution Poll —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Ditto. Except I use 1280x960, because pixels should be *square*. :) One problem with many web site designs is that they make text go from one side of the browser to the other. This is fine for one line, but it makes for painful reading if it's (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Screen Resolution Poll —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn8q0eg8.shl.....bu.edu... (...) than (...) :) You'll have to explain a little more to me about resolutions and pixel shapes when I'm out at Gordon. I'd like square pixels too :) (...) (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Screen Resolution Poll —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | (...) Simple. Monitors are approximately 4x3, so the resolutions should be too. Otherwise, bitmapped pictures get stretched or squished -- in the case of 1280x1024, squished by about 7%. (...) CSS provides a great way to do this -- it has both (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Screen Resolution Poll —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | (...) 'nuff said! I use mostly 1280x1024 and my Netscape is about two-thirds of the screen wide and as long as it can be. Works just fine. Ppl. complaining about to long rows, just narrow the browser a tad, problem solved. /Tobbe (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
