Subject:
|
Re: What was the longest thread on Lugnet?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Jul 2000 20:55:27 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@io.com+spamless+
|
Viewed:
|
160 times
|
| |
|
|
Erin Windross wrote:
> Do you know? (Hey I'm bored, this is just a useless-busywork-so-you-can-think-
> better-in-your-life-question-that-is-still-pretty-useless question!)
I have some trepidation in responding to this, since there's the chance
someone will want to try to top the record for the sake of topping the record
-- but this info is pretty easy to find anyhow.
The typical "long thread" seems to peter out after around 200 messages or so,
but a few have been true monsters. Here's the ones I remember directly,
though I'm sure that there have been bigger (except for the one I started.
;-)
Mormon bashing again, 570 messages:
http://www.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=4318
What happened?, 434 messages:
http://www.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=1177
Age limitations, 307 messages:
http://www.lugnet.com/org/us/?n=420
New Web Page, 298 messages:
http://www.lugnet.com/build/?n=1399
Conversaion with a LEGO rep, 277 messages:
http://www.lugnet.com/general/?n=6830
Introducing Lego Direct, 220 messages:
http://www.lugnet.com/general/?n=11596
Heartache and overloaded browser (and server) troubles aside, these have all
been fine discussions, raising some ugly (in a good way) issues and helping
set some good and useful LUGNET policies from time to time.
Now let's get back to discussing Lego, eh? Okay, fine, after you read 2100+
messages. :-,
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
If he's the One, I want to see the TWO!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
