 | | Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough! —Shiri Dori
|
| | | (...) I will never give in. I will compose a-less posts. I will!!! ;-) -Shiri (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough! —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) ^ oops. :) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough! —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | | (...) I refuse to stoop to such low heights. Proving ' point! :-O -Shiri (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough! —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | (...) Sure she shall. Shucks, essentially seventy-six persent (sorry, that's "percents") of Shiri's syllables sustain said a's. Sertainly (sorry, should say "with certainties") Sproat's ransomed letters are most scarce inside his messages. So how's (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough! —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) Indeed I will. Your posts are meeningless without s's; unlike mine, which will live on forever. (...) Truly, I'm not sure one could percieve something from the post shown here. I could not do so myself, & I'm the very one who smuggled the s's (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
