|
|
 | | Re: Evidence of Warm Blooded Dinosaurs
|
| (...) As far as I know, there is no debate. Icthyosaurs are not Dinosaurs, just as Pterosaurs aren't Dinosaurs either. :) However, all three types are Archosaurs. :) (...) First, the sauropod (in this case, Diplodocus) dug a hole with its rear feet. (...) (26 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Evidence of Warm Blooded Dinosaurs
|
| (...) There's even some debate as to whether ichthyosaurs were true dinosaurs anyway. (...) Yah, I was...Mondays. :-, (...) What ideas were those? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Evidence of Warm Blooded Dinosaurs
|
| (...) True, however, Ichthyosaurs are definitely not a good example, if you ask me. Sharks, after all, give birth to live young(I'm not sure about all of them, but I think they do), so perhaps laying eggs is a poor choice for large sea-going (...) (26 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Minifig Box #2, another update
|
| (...) That's okay; only the goalie needs hands, anyway. ;-) (moved this piece of the thread to .ot.fun) (26 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Evidence of Warm Blooded Dinosaurs
|
| (...) the (...) dinosaur (...) I (...) don't (...) "Predatory (...) conflates (...) based (...) bird (...) thus (...) juvenile, (...) made (...) into (...) (which (...) yes. (...) to (...) to (...) suggests (...) and (...) our (...) as the (...) (...) (26 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
