 | | Re: 1950's LEGO —Robert M. Dye
|
| | | Ummm. Why is off topic for off topic fun? Where would general silliness regarding LEGO belong? Rob --My best reply address is robdye@writeme.com (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 1950's LEGO —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | (...) I think he meant that by discussing lego, you are on-topic for the 'normal' lugnet groups... some people like to say that the word "lego" is not allowed in off-topic... I don't know, but I think that general silliness fits excellently in o- (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 1950's LEGO —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) Like Shiri said, 'off-topic' means 'not about lego'. Maybe LUGNET needs an .on-topic.fun group... Steve (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | General Silliness(was Re: 1950's LEGO) —Matthew Wilkins
|
| | | | Ah, I see you've determined my military name: General Silliness. That contrasts nicely with my Duwamish name: "Running Behind". -Cheese (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: General Silliness(was Re: 1950's LEGO) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) (Insert random crude Olestra joke here.) 'nuff said. LFB (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
