Subject:
|
Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:51:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
323 times
|
| |
|
|
That would be a *huge* category, wouldn't it? Let's see; the 'Terminator'
movies, FreeJack... umm... Okay, I'm dry. Anyone else?
-Cheese
In lugnet.space, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.space, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
> > It wasn't worth seeing it on the big screen -- the graphics were definitely
> > sub-par when compared with recent movies. :-( Not to mention that the wet
> > cardboard characterizations lacked the depth normally seen in typical
> > blockbuster-wannabe sci-fi movies. [...]
>
> That reminds me... :) A few years back, there was this really cheesy (IMHO)
> sci-fi movie called _Time Runner_ -- starred Mark Hamill and Rae Dawn Chong.
>
> Didn't catch it in the theatre, but the viddy box had this to say:
>
> "A cut above most time travel cyborg thrillers."
>
> I knew I had to rent it when I couldn't stop laughing as I imagined a section
> in some video rental store labeled "Time Travel Cyborg Thrillers." Boy, what
> a big genre that is!
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars
|
| (...) pumping a dry well, but: the original 'Millenium' was a time-travel movie with cyborgs everywhere in the future, does that count? (this movie was Chris Carter's debut, based on a John Varley short story, and elements of it surfaced in X-Files (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
