 | | Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars
|
|
(...) I saw it last night too, and from a "movie" perspective I have to agree with you. (...) That really bothered me too! And anyone else that passed high school physics! The significant thing about this movie is that it is the first major (...) (25 years ago, 11-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars
|
|
(...) On the other hand it might be taken to mean that NASA will now do anything to get funded. I tend to agree with Jerry Pournelle's screed that NASA has outlived its purpose (each time it holds back private rocketry and space launch.) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars
|
|
(...) I haven't seen it yet, but it's on my list of movies to see... (...) how many SF movies have you seen lately that DIDN'T fail high school physics, as you say? I'm at the point now that I don't expect them to make sense in our universe laws - I (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars
|
|
(...) Yeah, I'd have to agree here. I usually suspend my disbelief in regards to physics when seeing SciFi movies. OTOH, I felt the movie was just a bit unbalanced. They spent so much time getting to Mars, and then it was just wrapped up in 20 (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars
|
|
(...) his (...) enough (...) that, (...) If you want vicious reviews, you should see the ones posted here at Mars "face" central (Jet Propulsion Lab). Merciless. :-) Bruce (25 years ago, 14-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
