Subject:
|
Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Sun, 12 Mar 2000 19:45:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
133 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Dan Boger writes:
> how many SF movies have you seen lately that DIDN'T fail high school
> physics, as you say? I'm at the point now that I don't expect them to
> make sense in our universe laws - I just extend my "suspension of
> disbelief" to the physics part as well.
>
> :)
>
> Dan
Yeah, I'd have to agree here. I usually suspend my disbelief in regards to
physics when seeing SciFi movies.
OTOH, I felt the movie was just a bit unbalanced. They spent so much time
getting to Mars, and then it was just wrapped up in 20 minutes
with a nice bow on top. I would have liked seeing less of the "Apollo 13"
type stuff, and more of the story behind the aliens.
I wasn't totally disappointed with the movie, but I'm not going to rush to
the video store when it's released.
~Mar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars
|
| (...) I haven't seen it yet, but it's on my list of movies to see... (...) how many SF movies have you seen lately that DIDN'T fail high school physics, as you say? I'm at the point now that I don't expect them to make sense in our universe laws - I (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
5 Messages in This Thread: ![Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars -Kevin Loch (11-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars -Erik Olson (12-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars -Dan Boger (12-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars -Bruce Schlickbernd (14-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|