 | | Re: Favorite Lego Train?
|
|
(...) I learned on an HP-2000 (1977-78). ;-) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: SPAM
|
|
Yes, but I attribute it to my activity on eBay, not LUGNET. Look at this lame attempt: ___...___ Subject: Re:%20The%20sunshine...use%203119 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 12:14:13 EST From: Nsname1962@aol.com To: johnneal@uswest.net everyone is talking about (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | SPAM
|
|
Allright could it be more off-topic? I mean, to send something *NOT* funny to lugnet.off-topic.fun... Anyway, this latest week, I have recieved about ten spam-mails a day, compared to the normal amount of two or three a week. Could this have (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Favorite Lego Train?
|
|
(...) Hmm, somehow I think this HP 2100 is a little more powerfull and usefull than the HP 2100 I learned to program on... (that HP 2100 was essentially a PDP-8 clone). This post just jumped out of the Lugnet summary listings and begged to be (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Legoholic
|
|
(...) time. (...) I came out of my dark ages back in the summer of 98 and started a buying frenzy that Fall that lasted into early January '99. I built a pretty impressive Pirate collection from scratch, and picked up a few Town sets. Then the (...) (25 years ago, 7-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: What are you going to do with all those half price 8448's?
|
|
(...) No, didn't you see the attribution? It was on the PR Newswire! It's a real product. I use it at least two times a week. (seriously, yes, I made it up...) (25 years ago, 7-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: What are you going to do with all those half price 8448's?
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:389B2D55.F1AA03...ger.net... (...) when I (...) again. (...) ROFL. Did you make that one up? Huw (25 years ago, 7-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO-Direct
|
|
In article <389CF082.A2BFABE9@v...ager.net>, lar@voyager.net says... (...) In other words, it's for Gag Purposes Only (TM) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Legoholic
|
|
BLASPHEMER! BLASPHEMER! <ripping garments> BAN THE DAN, BAN THE DAN!! ;^D John "D. Jezek" wrote: Too much of anything is not good, even Lego. (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Does your train layout move?
|
|
(...) Hands down, your offer sounds more inviting than Jeff "the Daumer" Stembel's! {;^D -John "thread mixer" Neal (...) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
