Subject:
|
Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 00:31:30 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
LPIENIAZEK@NOVERAihatespam.COM
|
Viewed:
|
151 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Sproaticus wrote:
> Which reminds me, I'm planning my next vacation...Cheese!
> We'll go somewhere where there's cheese!
Well that certainly sounds like it would be a grand day out. Watch out
for unruly washing machines, though.
--
Larry Pieniazek - larryp@novera.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego?
|
| (...) S'no problem here. What I find offensive is the callous way he snubbed us cheese lovers. Cheeses have rights too! Which reminds me, I'm planning my next vacation...Cheese! We'll go somewhere where there's cheese! Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
14 Messages in This Thread: ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Jeremy H. Sproat (2-Feb-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Matthew Wilkins (2-Feb-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -James Powell (2-Feb-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Matthew Wilkins (2-Feb-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Lindsay Frederick Braun (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Matthew Wilkins (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Larry Pieniazek (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Steven Vore (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Steven Vore (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Matthew Wilkins (4-Feb-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Steven Vore (4-Feb-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Steven Vore (4-Feb-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Matthew Wilkins (4-Feb-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|