To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 4152
    Re: The Law of Falling Lego —John Neal
    (...) Not to mention the roofs...<runnning> >;-) -John (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
   
        Spelling (Re: The Law of Falling Lego) —David Carriker
   (...) hoof -> hooves roof -> rooves (???) OR roof -> roofs hoof -> hoofs (???) Ahhhhhh..... That's english for ya' :) -David (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
   
        Re: Spelling (Re: The Law of Falling Lego) —Ian Warfield
     (...) But it *can* be spelled hoofs, as in "huffs" or "hoooffs". In fact I've seen it spelled that way more often than the other way. But I don't like it when people say "ruffs". -- Ian (Incidentally, does anyone here say "tomahto"?) :P (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
   
        Re: Spelling (Re: The Law of Falling Lego) —Jeff Stembel
   (...) FTR, I made a mistake. I checked the dictionary, and rooves is not a plural form of roof. :) Ahhh... I love English. ;) Jeff (24 years ago, 28-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR