Subject:
|
Re: A stupid DOS question.....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Dec 1998 22:31:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
649 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 8 Dec 1998 21:12:06 GMT, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley)
wrote:
> Jasper Janssen <janssenjasper@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Dec 1998 16:57:01 GMT, Sproaticus <jsproat@geocities.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Didn't PC-DOS have a bunch of really cool features that MS-DOS never
> > > had, such as reliable task-switching and reliable disk compression,
> > > among other things?
> >
> > Well, disk compression sucks whatever the platform, and task-switching
> > without the facility to see both programs at the same time, and
> > preferably at least semi-true multitasking, so both run at the same
> > time, is only half a solution. Besides, the only reason to use DOS
> > today, is either for games compatability, in which case PCDOS sucks
> > because it sin't compatible, or low hardware requirements, in which
> > case it's almost always better to use MSDOS without all the nifty
> > features.
>
> Ah, so you're gonna run X on that 386/16 with 4 megs? :)
Errr.. You prolly could, if you're just planning on running several
Xterms... which was kinda the thing I meant.
Actually, right here, i was just talking about DOS. You run DOS to
play Doom, is about my assessment of the current situation in OSes :)
Jasper
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
103 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
