To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 408
407  |  409
Subject: 
Re: A stupid DOS question.....
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 8 Dec 1998 21:12:06 GMT
Reply-To: 
CJC@NEWSGUYspamcake.COM
Viewed: 
538 times
  
Jasper Janssen <janssenjasper@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 8 Dec 1998 16:57:01 GMT, Sproaticus <jsproat@geocities.com>
wrote:

Didn't PC-DOS have a bunch of really cool features that MS-DOS never
had, such as reliable task-switching and reliable disk compression,
among other things?

Well, disk compression sucks whatever the platform, and task-switching
without the facility to see both programs at the same time, and
preferably at least semi-true multitasking, so both run at the same
time, is only half a solution. Besides, the only reason to use DOS
today, is either for games compatability, in which case PCDOS sucks
because it sin't compatible, or low hardware requirements, in which
case it's almost always better to use MSDOS without all the nifty
features.


Ah, so you're gonna run X on that 386/16 with 4 megs?  :)


--
Unofficial listing of weekly US Lego Shop at Home phone specials
http://www.lugnet.com/lsahs/  (discontinued thru Holiday season)
800-835-4386 (S@H USA) / 800-267-5346 ext 222 (S@H Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - Meet more LEGO fans in your area through LUGNET



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: A stupid DOS question.....
 
(...) Errr.. You prolly could, if you're just planning on running several Xterms... which was kinda the thing I meant. Actually, right here, i was just talking about DOS. You run DOS to play Doom, is about my assessment of the current situation in (...) (26 years ago, 8-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A stupid DOS question.....
 
(...) Well, disk compression sucks whatever the platform, and task-switching without the facility to see both programs at the same time, and preferably at least semi-true multitasking, so both run at the same time, is only half a solution. Besides, (...) (26 years ago, 8-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

103 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR