To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 2823
2822  |  2824
Subject: 
Re: Name That Movie (Was: Misperceptions of America)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 7 Sep 1999 12:14:08 GMT
Viewed: 
4759 times
  
Larry Pieniazek wrote:

> Really? I thought it was dreck.

Oh, it wasn't a great movie, but I liked some of it. (Nowadays, that is all I
can ask for!)

I read the book after watching the movie, they are not similar.
> 
> The book is a well written and thoughtful examination of what it would
> be like to organize a society around the principle that only those that
> have made a contribution to society (in the form of defense or civilian
> service) have the right to make decisions about how things will be in
> that society, and only AFTER they have finished contributing. At the
> same time it's a good military SF story, perhaps one of the very first
> ones. If I can't have libertopia, I'd consider living there...

As would I....

> 
> The movie twists the society around to be a consumer-fascist one where
> everyone appears to be a moron.

Really? I did not pick the consumer part at all, the fascist part, yes, to a
point. I was focusing on the the service for two years aspect, an idea that has
merit, IMHO.

> It interjects gratuitous nudity (about
> the only part of the movie I actually LIKED)

Huh, I didn't care for it all that much.

> that does nothing for plot
> development, kills people off for no reason, has excessive gore for the
> storyline, and distorts just about every major character into something
> completely different from the book.

Yes. But the ships were cool! :) Can't say that for the military actions though.
Lets see, we have all these cool starships, lets send thousands of infantry to
their death, yes!! I liked the robotic suits in the book idea, I don't think
they could have made that for the movie, though, unless it was really scaled
back!

> RAH said no one was really able to make movies of his books. I agree.
> Not his fault. Most of hollywood isn't up to it.

Yes, it did not match the book.

> What a terrible movie.

Most people agree. I think it was OK, in my own twisted way anyway. I thought
the FEDNET commercials were a crackup, anyway. Are you doing YOUR part, Larry?
;)

Scott S.

--
Scott E. Sanburn
CADD Operator, CADD Systems Administrator
Affiliated Engineers, Inc. Ann Arbor, MI

Work Page:
http://www.aeieng.com/
Home Page:
http://www.geocities.com/~legoguy712/index.html
Lego Page:
http://www.geocities.com/~legoguy712/legoindex.html


“The more people I meet, the more I like my Lego collection.”



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Misperceptions of America (Was: Conversation w/ a LEGO Rep)
 
(...) Ok, I can see where you were coming from. (...) can (...) Elephant (...) the (...) While I do not deny that he perjured, my point is that the majority of Americans view that perjury as a non-perjury, and certainly not impeachable. And the (...) (27 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

276 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR