 | | Re: Off Topic: New location for Austalia —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Technically correct, yes. But I had this vision of OZ up and moving thousands of miles overnight. (...) We don't by convention use locality in our formal addresses, that's a UK thing. Todd introduced it here for whatever reasons in a few cases (...) (26 years ago, 23-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Off Topic: New location for Austalia —Ed Jones
|
| | | | | (...) I thought he meant that Australia went from being in the "blue light special" aisle to the clearances bins. :') (26 years ago, 23-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Off Topic: New location for Austalia —Chris Moseley
|
| | | | Larry Pieniazek wrote (...) Isn't that a California thing? You know, San Francisco is going to be part of Hawaii after the quake. Moz (26 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Off Topic: New location for Austalia —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) No, LA will be neighbors with Seattle. The whole coast is moving North. Steve (26 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Off Topic: New location for Austalia —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) It was my understanding that LA would go *somewhere*, and to buy property in Yuma, AZ, the west coast heir apparent;-) -John (26 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
