 | | Moving threads (was Re: TEST PLEASE DON'T READ!!! —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) I think he was asking for Todd to move the appends he already made, but who can say for sure. Personally, I'd consign them to the howling void, they were content free. (1) Todd doesn't purge stuff of others, though, as that would make him an (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Moving threads (was Re: TEST PLEASE DON'T READ!!! —Nick Holdbrooks
|
| | | | | OOOO!!!! now I'm offended, disregard my reply in the "kudos (was pnuematics & mindstorms)" it's my little piece of the net, my thread of happyness, something I can control, you can't be given cool status when you post to it anymore, meany man! (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Moving threads (was Re: TEST PLEASE DON'T READ!!! —Ickna
|
| | | | | Please read my apologies in lugnet.general I am very sorry I made you mad. Nick (26 years ago, 18-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Moving threads (was Re: TEST PLEASE DON'T READ!!! —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Hmm. Is not archiving something considered censorship or editing? --Todd (26 years ago, 18-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Moving threads (was Re: TEST PLEASE DON'T READ!!! —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) There are certain questions it's better not to ask, because if you didn't ask, you can't claim ignorance of the answer. This was one of them. But that's OK, I bet it was a facetious question. ++Lar ======== Posted via the LUGNET discussion (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Moving threads (was Re: TEST PLEASE DON'T READ!!! —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) It was indeed a facetious question. --Todd (26 years ago, 18-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
