| | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD
|
|
(...) Does Larry have moss in his eyes? No? See, it works. Steve (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
|
| | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD
|
|
(...) He must be in the Southern hemisphere, at least at the time of writing. This is plausible...He appears to travel a great deal. (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
|
| | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD
|
|
(...) Chris Weeks (1) has once again explained things for the benefit of those unbelievers who didn't immediately leap to the correct conclusion... that I was speaking from an OZ perspective. Oh, you doubters, you try me so. Be of good cheer, (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
|
| | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD
|
|
(...) What? Have I been doing this too much of late? I just like to come up with the explanations. And isn't acolyte a piece of Catholic jargon anyway? In what way are you linked to His Holiness? (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
|
| | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD
|
|
(...) We're both Polish? But no, acolyte is generic. (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|