Subject:
|
Re: LEGO physics
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Apr 1999 16:45:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
192 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Jesse Long writes:
> Ed Jones wrote in message ...
> > Why is it that if you are sitting at a table playing with LEGO, if you drop • a
> > piece it will inevitably bounce to the farthest point from you under the • table?
> >
> > Now if I could only get the cats to fetch LEGO.
Start by building an RCX mouse.
> Murphy's Law, isn't it? And what about the rule that says if you drop a
> second piece to see where it goes it never goes in the original direction
> (damn chaos theory)?
Pieces also have the ability to camoflauge themselves when being searched for,
but they can't keep it up forever because when you work out a substitute design
or piece they become visible again.
-Tom McD.
when replying please frost the spamcake.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LEGO physics
|
| (...) design (...) Yeah, I have one heck of a time trying to find one blue 2x2 brick when it is in a bucket of blue 2x2 bricks! :') (25 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LEGO physics
|
| Ed Jones wrote in message ... (...) a (...) table? (...) Murphy's Law, isn't it? And what about the rule that says if you drop a second piece to see where it goes it never goes in the original direction (damn chaos theory)? Jesse ___...___ Jesse The (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
