|
|
 | | Re: Brickshelf poll
|
| To All, Yikes! (...) Let's try this: Is it worthwhile? There are others that monitor LUGNET and discussion threads that are more knowledgable about whether this kind of group is needed than I. Scott S. -- President, Michiana-LUG: (2 URLs) pages: (...) (21 years ago, 7-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf poll
|
| Mark & All, (...) Well, I didnt know where to put this post, I guess it could have went under .people too, I was just trying to steer it away from .general. : ) I had the same problem when I posted here on the morning of September 11th, 2001, trying (...) (21 years ago, 7-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf poll
|
| (...) Hence my cross-posting to lugnet.admin.suggestions... 'Tis not the first time I've run across this situation. If posting to the supergroup seems suboptimal, how about adding this subgroup as a catch all: lugnet.off-topic.pos...p-for-them Of (...) (21 years ago, 7-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf poll
|
| (...) But now that you have steered the topic into off-topic.geek territory the problem is solved! (very clever Lar!) Maggie C. (21 years ago, 7-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf poll
|
| (...) There currently is no group called off-topic without a suffix. LUGNET newsgroup hierarchy does not require the existance of the supergroup before subgroups can exist... (21 years ago, 7-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
|
