|
|
 | | Re: Brickshelf poll
|
| To All, Yikes! (...) Let's try this: Is it worthwhile? There are others that monitor LUGNET and discussion threads that are more knowledgable about whether this kind of group is needed than I. Scott S. -- President, Michiana-LUG: (2 URLs) pages: (...) (21 years ago, 7-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf poll
|
| Mark & All, (...) Well, I didnt know where to put this post, I guess it could have went under .people too, I was just trying to steer it away from .general. : ) I had the same problem when I posted here on the morning of September 11th, 2001, trying (...) (21 years ago, 7-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf poll
|
| (...) Hence my cross-posting to lugnet.admin.suggestions... 'Tis not the first time I've run across this situation. If posting to the supergroup seems suboptimal, how about adding this subgroup as a catch all: lugnet.off-topic.pos...p-for-them Of (...) (21 years ago, 7-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf poll
|
| (...) But now that you have steered the topic into off-topic.geek territory the problem is solved! (very clever Lar!) Maggie C. (21 years ago, 7-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf poll
|
| (...) There currently is no group called off-topic without a suffix. LUGNET newsgroup hierarchy does not require the existance of the supergroup before subgroups can exist... (21 years ago, 7-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf poll
|
| (...) Curious you can't just post this in plain old lugnet.off-topic, seeing as how it's off-topic for any of the off-topic subgroups... :-) Mark (21 years ago, 7-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Delicious!
|
| (...) My friends and I sometimes make up words that fit the happening, like "Hey! Vuja-de!! This has never happened to us before" and we look around all curious and awed-like. It is usually said in an ironic voice 'cause what had, indeed, (...) (21 years ago, 5-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: unpalatable truth
|
| Oops! (...) (21 years ago, 5-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | unpalatable truth
|
| I liked this. It has been said before, but it is worth reading again: (URL) Resist the official pol-speak of Bush's 'war on terror'> Terrorism is a salient case in point. In the abstract, "terrorism" is a terrible thing; everybody deplores it; (...) (21 years ago, 5-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Delicious!
|
| (...) It's like (URL) deja vu all over again>. (proving my point once again:-) JOHN (21 years ago, 5-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Delicious!
|
| (...) But (URL) here> it gets fun! FUT .debate (if anyone wants to debate "fun"; if you wish to make fun of the debate, set FUT .fun; if other, use your best judgement) Pedro (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Delicious!
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Larry Pieniazek wrote: (snippage) Geezopetes, I forgot to set the FUT to just debate... so now instead of the thread moving, it's duplicated... all of it, even the part where I get agreement that it doesn't belong in .fun (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Delicious!
|
| (...) Didn't you already post that (URL) Dave! (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Delicious!
|
| (...) Irony!! Stop it!! You're killing me!!! (...) Ooh! DEATH!! Dave K -who doens't mean to sound like Iain, but after this monstrously bad day, anything like this just cracks me up! (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Delicious!
|
| (...) Didn't you already post that (URL) Dave! 8^) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Delicious!
|
| (...) That which has been is that which will be, and that which has been done is that which will be done. So there is nothing new under the sun. Is there anything of which one might say, "See this, it is new"? Already it has existed for ages which (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Delicious!
|
| (...) (URL) Chicken Run> made use of that joke, as well. Clever! Dave! (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Delicious!
|
| (...) (snip) My all-time favorite Wizard of ID comic: Sir Rodney comes running into the presence of the King and exclaims, "Sire, the peasants are revolting!" Wryly under his breath the King observes: "You can say that again." Classic. JOHN (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Delicious!
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Dave Schuler wrote: <snip> (...) I wouldn't eat that stuff under almost any conditions. They should feature it in 'Fear Factor' for the eating part.... I remember an old 'Wizard of ID' comic in which the King, while sitting (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Delicious!
|
| (...) Doh! That's where I meant to put it. Force of habit, I suppose. Or maybe LUGNET suffered a glitch that put my .fun post in .debate despite my best efforts. That seems likely... (...) I feel worse and worse about posting the link, but I swear I (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
