To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 10337 (-10)
  Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
 
Well. I am not looking for a big heavy discussion. If the participants arent going to be friendly then I am not intersted and that is the general vibe that I hear about it. I am also not interested in deep theological discusions. I didnt come here (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Cost overruns
 
(...) Haha! I think you did a fine job of keeping this light and non-combative. On topic (or is it off-topic, I get confused in this area of Lugnet, or LUGNet, or wherever we are)... I must admit that one of the reasons I chose to point out the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Cost overruns
 
(...) You wrote, "Just the other day I called to request a song on a local radio station and had to explain I was "having a beer and playing with Lego Toys." Though, I didn't name the beer brand." You've got to stop drinking and building man! ;) (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
 
(...) .debate doesn't suffer fools gladly, no. If you just waltz in there and tell people you have some Good News for them, you're not likely to get a warm reception. (...) and some silliness, and you have the common sense to tell which is which, (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
 
(...) Abednego, I think. When I was a kid, I was taught a little mnemonic; "shake the bed, make the bed, and to bed we go." Innocent then, but now I think it could have other implications ;') The Rev. might get a kick out of that one... I wonder (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Cost overruns
 
(...) Ahh, but also also note that in the world of copy editing and publication, it is improper to use ALL CAPS in that manner... Revisit my post from last year's discussion and note the bit about theslot.com... :) (URL) Galactic Mediator (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Cost overruns
 
"John" <John@TCLTC.org> wrote in message news:HDrEyF.185F@lugnet.com... (...) lowercase (...) Also note the incorrect newsgroup. Quite clearly this is an on-topic fun posting and therefore should not be put in off-topic.fun ; P -- James Stacey (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Cost overruns
 
(...) Ahh, but also note the *incorrect* form of the word "LEGO" (use of lowercase letters instead of the proper uppercase). JOHN (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Cost overruns
 
Just saw this in yesterday's paper (URL) the correct use of (r) and TM! ... grin!) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Obnoxious over-reaction vs. sugar coating
 
(...) I tried that strange liquid you refer to as 'cheap light beer' once. Blech. Gimme an import - does that make me more geeky? -Tim (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR