 | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
|
(...) Yes, its well deserved…and its only gonna get better with the sequels. Mind you, the first book -IS- the slow one…it sets the pace and background for the next two!!! “Bigger than Star Wars” Indeed, --==RiçhärÐ==-- (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
|
(...) Modern movies tend to spike to the top of the list, because they're fresher in people's minds. I seem to remember, though, that they tend to settle down a little bit after time. Adrian (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
|
(...) My son is ten. The only problem he had was what the other poster mentioned: even though he went to the restroom just before the start of the movie, he had to go midway through (I sent him at the safest point when little would happen onscreen) (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
|
(...) It was a good movie. A solid, though flawed, interpretation of a book that is among the greatest masterpieces of literature ever produced. As a movie, the Fellowship of the Ring lacked the subtleties of emotion and sensitivity that sets a (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: If you google the phrase "Spooky Bible Stories"...
|
|
AAAAAGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!! Hop-Frog, don't lead us to stuff like this, please! Have mercy!!! Seriously though, is this guy for real? -Dave (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lord of the Rings movie
|
|
Note: the second time through I listened to the music more. It's good too. Darn it, it has been in my head all day. You can hear the entire album in QuickTime: (URL) movies cost 30% less in the Midwest... (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
|
Here's something I don't understand. WHY would anyone take children under the age of 10 to see this film. First off, it's rated PG-13. Secondly, it's 3 hours long. Finally, the story isn't suitable for younger viewers anymore than the Matrix was. (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | If you google the phrase "Spooky Bible Stories"...
|
|
...you'll end up at this lovely piece of roadkill on the Information Superhighway: (URL) could comment, but why spoil your "fun." -- Hop-Frog (this is what I get for reading threads about gay minifigs...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Fellowship
|
|
(...) Doooode! Isn't there a live action Narnia thing from the BBC? I think I saw it about three or four years ago... -- Hop-Frog (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
|
(...) Yes, kids younger than 10 should start reading the book. By the time they finish they will have no problem with the film. (It is PG-13.) Spoiler zone Spoiler zone Spoiler zone Spoiler zone Spoiler zone Spoiler zone Spoiler zone Spoiler zone (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
