 | | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
| I would agree to not take any small children to see Lord of the Rings, but for a different reason: no kid under 10 years old would be able to sit through the whole movie without needing to go to the bathroom, even if they had gone right before it (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Lord of the Rings movie
|
| (...) Ageist! ok, maybe it was the 3rd grader bragging a little. -Erik (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Fellowship
|
| (...) Yes, well it does. But there is some dispute among Tolkien scholars about just how long Gandalfs toes were. Some claim that his toes reached about to his belt, based on scientific evidence relating toe length to thickness of eyebrows, while (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Fellowship on Film
|
| First of all, do NOT take any small children to see this film. I would say probably 10 would be the youngest who should see it, and that is pushing it. Younger kids will have nightmares for weeks, possibly years, if they are subjected to this film. (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Fellowship
|
| (...) I thought it touched his toes? ROSCO (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
