 | | Re: Toys used to be so much better —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | (...) It's true. The Barbie I played with as a child had clothes with real buttons and zippers rather than cheap strips of Velcro. My Creepy Crawler maker had molds made of real metal. My Schwinn bicycle with the balloon tires later became trendy as (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Toys used to be so much better —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) I'm curious if anyone knows of any real analysis of the price of toys. My gut feel is that the quality toys have possibly actually fallen in real cost (LEGO certainly appears to have done so, looking at the Lugnet Set Guide, the 10 cents a (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Toys used to be so much better —Katie Dokken
|
| | | | (...) They used too. I used to be a huge Playmobil collector. I have 100's of sets. All in original boxes too. But I've noticed a steady decline in quality the last 2-3 years, also the company itself has really become hard to deal with as well. (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Toys used to be so much better —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | (...) *sigh* I'm sorry to hear that. I suppose they, like everyone else, are looking at the bottom line. Maggie (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
